A friend once gave me a badge that read “It’s not hoarding if it’s books”. To my family, that would have been as obvious as stating that the sun rises east and sinks west. My grandmother was probably the most selective. She preferred first editions and hardbacks in attractive bindings, but if that was unaffordable, paperbacks would have to do. My mother didn’t care. Indeed, when I started Good Reading, she gave me some of her rarer first editions to sell provided I had another copy as replacement.
Having now run a second-hand book shop for nearly thirty years, I’m not sure I still believe in that statement. I have been invited into houses to buy books where the shelving of the books indicated an interest that had gone out of control. There was no longer any logical order, and some of the shelves had collapsed due to the weight of the books. Picking through the books was like archaeological dig, the books reflecting the owner’s changing interests, often over decades.
I have also been intrigued by the fact that in many ways the concept that “it ain’t hoarding if it’s books” still applies. Would Imelda Marcos have been so cruelly mocked if she’d collected thousands of books, rather than one thousand plus shoes? I suspect that this has to do with a period when literacy reflected social status.
But back to “family traditions”. My mother didn’t drive. We lived in North Carlton, but if there was a book fair anywhere in Melbourne, my mother would turn it into an outing. One of the best books fairs was an annual one in Box Hill. We would catch public transport and loaded with books, all incredibly cheap, a taxi back home. As this was before mobiles, I suspect it involved standing patiently on the main road waiting for a vacant taxi to drive past.
Book fairs and book shops were the only places where I could pick whatever I wanted without my selection being scrutinised by my mother or told “Too many, put some back”. If anything, she would add to my pile with books she had loved or felt I should read.
Memory tells me that relatively speaking, books in the sixties, new and second hand, were much cheaper than they are today. Hopefully this is because writers today are paid higher royalties than then. As a negative, binding today can be atrocious, with books falling apart while being read, although that issue appears to have been addressed.
Which brings me to the elephant in the room: e-books. Will they in time replace the printed one? I don’t know. I have heard that the brain does not absorb information as well from a digital script as from a printed one. Personally, for me nothing will ever replace the tactile joy of a printed book or the ability to underline and highlight interesting sections (pencil only please).
There is something cold and unfriendly about tablets, though with space these days at a premium, they do make a lot of sense. Punch once had a wonderful cartoon of two very British gentlemen standing before a bookshelf containing three or four tablets. One remarks to the other “That’s a very impressive library you have there, Baines.”
I will finish with a toast to my sadly deceased partner Ken. Ken believed that one’s possessions should all fit in a plastic bag. He lived very closely to that belief, which left me with an infinite amount of space for my book hoarding, of which he was amazingly tolerant. Except, of course, that “it ain’t hoarding if it’s books”.
Delfina Manor
July 2026
RSS Feed